T31n1623_觀總相論頌

大正藏第 31 冊 No. 1623 觀總相論頌

No. 1623

觀總相論頌一卷

陳那菩薩造

三藏法師義凈奉　制譯

諸有樂略者　　彼已顯方隅　若有愛煩文　　為彼說總相　由聲及義智　　俗言為本者　是觀總相言　　此頌聲及義　謂聲並義二　　此中二種智　名聲兼義智　　彼為根本者　謂即于因義　　由諸世間說　以聲義智本　　是故勒為頌　聲義及智義　　故略造斯論　問名義連屬　　是俗說為本　何以故今云　　但唯辦聲義　答曰不如此　　縱有連屬聲　唯名與義二　　諸有許共相　所詮及能詮　　此中理印持　咸攝入於此　　謂不相離性　方許相連屬　　故今不別說　由能詮名等　　唯局連屬門　了彼所詮義　　故以總相性　方得解了者　　后當以廣說　故唯聲義智　　連屬道理成　有餘複意樂　　此中名義二　有三種差別　　謂聲並義二

觀總相論頌一卷

【現代漢語翻譯】現代漢語譯本《觀總相論頌》一卷陳那菩薩造三藏法師義凈奉　制譯對於那些喜歡簡略的人，（總相）已經顯明瞭綱要。如果有人喜歡繁瑣的文字，就為他們解說總相。憑藉聲音以及對意義的理解，以世俗的言語為根本。這就是觀察總相的言論，此頌包含聲音和意義。所謂聲音和意義二者，這裡有兩種智慧。名為聲音兼意義的智慧，以它們為根本。所謂以因的意義，通過世間眾生的說法。以聲音、意義和智慧為根本，所以概括為頌。聲音、意義以及智慧的意義，因此簡略地造了這部論。問：名和義的連屬，是以世俗的說法為根本。為什麼現在說，僅僅是辨別聲音和意義？答：不是這樣的，即使有連屬的聲音。也只有名和義二者，那些認為有共同相的人。所詮釋的和能詮釋的，這裡有理智的印證。都包含在這裡面，所謂不相離的性質。才允許相互連屬，所以現在不另外說明。由於能詮釋的名等等，只侷限於連屬的方面。瞭解那所詮釋的意義，所以以總相的性質。才能得以理解，後面將會詳細解說。所以只有聲音、意義和智慧，連屬的道理才能成立。還有其他的意樂，這裡名和義二者。有三種差別，即聲音和意義二者。《觀總相論頌》一卷

【English Translation】 English version 'Verses on the Treatise on Examining General Characteristics', one fascicle Composed by Bodhisattva Dignāga (Chenna pusa) Translated by the Tripiṭaka Master Yijing (San Zang Fa Shi Yi Jing) under Imperial Order For those who delight in brevity, the outline has already been made clear. If there are those who love elaborate texts, for them, the general characteristics are explained. Relying on sound and the understanding of meaning, with conventional language as the foundation. This is the discourse on examining general characteristics; this verse encompasses sound and meaning. So-called sound and meaning, these two; here, there are two kinds of wisdom. Named the wisdom of sound and meaning combined; taking them as the foundation. So-called the meaning of cause, through the speech of sentient beings. With sound, meaning, and wisdom as the foundation, therefore, summarized into verses. Sound, meaning, and the meaning of wisdom; therefore, this treatise is briefly composed. Question: The connection between name and meaning is based on conventional speech. Why is it now said that it is merely distinguishing sound and meaning? Answer: It is not so; even if there are connected sounds. There are only name and meaning, those who admit to having a common characteristic. What is explained and what can explain, here there is rational proof. All are included herein, the so-called nature of non-separation. Only then is mutual connection allowed, so it is not separately explained now. Because the name that can explain, etc., is only limited to the aspect of connection. Understanding the meaning that is explained, therefore, with the nature of general characteristics. Only then can it be understood; it will be explained in detail later. Therefore, only sound, meaning, and wisdom, the principle of connection can be established. There are other intentions as well; here, name and meaning, these two. Have three kinds of differences, namely sound and meaning, these two. 'Verses on the Treatise on Examining General Characteristics', one fascicle